# Harbor vs MCSManager

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Harbor | MCSManager |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 68/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Container Registry | #8 of 62 in Game Servers |
| GitHub stars | 29 635 ✓ | 5 004 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +191 ✓ | +34 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 20 ✓ |
| Latest release | v2.14.6 · 23 Oct 2026 | v10.22.0 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Harbor scores 80/100 against 68/100 for MCSManager, so it is the safer default.

MCSManager ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Harbor.

If you want the quickest setup, MCSManager is easier to run; Harbor needs more configuration.

Harbor is growing faster right now (+191 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Harbor](https://selfhost.directory/project/harbor) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/harbor.md)
- [MCSManager](https://selfhost.directory/project/mcsmanager) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mcsmanager.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/harbor-vs-mcsmanager