Harborvslivekit
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Harbor | livekit | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 80/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 12 in Container Registry | #2 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 29 638 | 21 902 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +184 | +803 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 19 |
| Latest release | v2.14.6 · 23 Oct 2026 | v1.13.11 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Harbor and livekit score the same (80/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
livekit ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Harbor.
If you want the quickest setup, Harbor is easier to run; livekit needs more configuration.
livekit is growing faster right now (+803 stars in 30 days).
Harbor details →livekit details →
Swap a project
Keep Harbor, compare it with
Keep livekit, compare it with