Harakavsweb-check
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Haraka | web-check | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 16 in Mail Server | #1 of 3 in OSINT |
| GitHub stars | 5 627 | 35 285 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +10 | +374 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 3 |
| Latest release | v3.3.5 · 17 Oct 2026 | 2.3.0 · 2 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
web-check scores 81/100 against 67/100 for Haraka, so it is the safer default.
Haraka ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for web-check.
If you want the quickest setup, web-check is easier to run; Haraka needs more configuration.
web-check is growing faster right now (+374 stars in 30 days).
Haraka details →web-check details →
Swap a project
Keep Haraka, compare it with
Keep web-check, compare it with