Harakavsverdaccio
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Haraka | verdaccio | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 16 in Mail Server | #1 of 11 in Package Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 627 | 17 956 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +10 | +57 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 29 |
| Latest release | v3.3.5 · 17 Oct 2026 | v7.0.2 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
verdaccio scores 76/100 against 67/100 for Haraka, so it is the safer default.
verdaccio ships more often: 29 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for Haraka.
If you want the quickest setup, verdaccio is easier to run; Haraka needs more configuration.
verdaccio is growing faster right now (+57 stars in 30 days).
Haraka details →verdaccio details →
Swap a project
Keep Haraka, compare it with
Keep verdaccio, compare it with