# Haraka vs UUSEC WAF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Haraka | UUSEC WAF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 16 in Mail Server | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 5 627 ✓ | 1 719 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +10 ✓ | +7 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v3.3.5 · 17 Oct 2026 ✓ | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | JavaScript | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

Haraka scores 67/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.

Haraka ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.

## Details

- [Haraka](https://selfhost.directory/project/haraka) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/haraka.md)
- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/haraka-vs-uusec-waf