HarakavsUpptime
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Haraka | Upptime | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 69/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 16 in Mail Server | #3 of 12 in Uptime Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 5 627 | 17 185 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +10 | +1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.3.5 · 17 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Markdown |
Which one should you pick?
Upptime scores 69/100 against 67/100 for Haraka, so it is the safer default.
Haraka ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Upptime.
If you want the quickest setup, Upptime is easier to run; Haraka needs more configuration.
Haraka is growing faster right now (+10 stars in 30 days).
Haraka details →Upptime details →
Swap a project
Keep Haraka, compare it with
Keep Upptime, compare it with