HarakavsTypst
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Haraka | Typst | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 16 in Mail Server | #1 of 2 in Publishing |
| GitHub stars | 5 627 | 56 869 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +10 | +140 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 5 |
| Latest release | v3.3.5 · 17 Oct 2026 | v0.15.1 · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Typst scores 82/100 against 67/100 for Haraka, so it is the safer default.
Haraka ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for Typst.
If you want the quickest setup, Typst is easier to run; Haraka needs more configuration.
Typst is growing faster right now (+140 stars in 30 days).
Haraka details →Typst details →
Swap a project
Keep Haraka, compare it with
Keep Typst, compare it with