# Haraka vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Haraka | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 16 in Mail Server | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 5 627 | 118 130 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +10 | +5 771 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v3.3.5 · 17 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 67/100 for Haraka, so it is the safer default.

Haraka ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 771 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Haraka](https://selfhost.directory/project/haraka) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/haraka.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/haraka-vs-tradingagents