Harakavssupabase
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Haraka | supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 92/100 |
| Rank in category | #6 of 16 in Mail Server | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 627 | 114 271 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +10 | +3 523 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 8 |
| Latest release | v3.3.5 · 17 Oct 2026 | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 67/100 for Haraka, so it is the safer default.
Haraka ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for supabase.
If you want the quickest setup, Haraka is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 523 stars in 30 days).
Haraka details →supabase details →
Swap a project
Keep Haraka, compare it with
Keep supabase, compare it with