# Haraka vs SeaweedFS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Haraka | SeaweedFS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 81/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #6 of 16 in Mail Server | #1 of 11 in Cloud Storage |
| GitHub stars | 5 627 | 35 803 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +10 | +842 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 28 ✓ |
| Latest release | v3.3.5 · 17 Oct 2026 | 4.51 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

SeaweedFS scores 81/100 against 67/100 for Haraka, so it is the safer default.

SeaweedFS ships more often: 28 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for Haraka.

SeaweedFS is growing faster right now (+842 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Haraka](https://selfhost.directory/project/haraka) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/haraka.md)
- [SeaweedFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/seaweedfs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/haraka-vs-seaweedfs