# hanko vs Vigil365

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hanko | Vigil365 |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 40 in Authentication | #46 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 9 052 ✓ | 284 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +17 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 2 |
| Latest release | backend/v3.1.0 · 1 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.1.0 · 28 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | C# |

## Which one should you pick?

hanko scores 68/100 against 49/100 for Vigil365, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, hanko is easier to run; Vigil365 needs more configuration.

hanko is growing faster right now (+17 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hanko](https://selfhost.directory/project/hanko) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hanko.md)
- [Vigil365](https://selfhost.directory/project/vigil365) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/vigil365.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hanko-vs-vigil365