# hanko vs UUSEC WAF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hanko | UUSEC WAF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 40 in Authentication | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 9 051 ✓ | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +15 ✓ | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 9 ✓ |
| Latest release | backend/v3.1.0 · 1 Oct 2026 | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Go | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

hanko scores 68/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.

UUSEC WAF ships more often: 9 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for hanko.

hanko is growing faster right now (+15 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hanko](https://selfhost.directory/project/hanko) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hanko.md)
- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hanko-vs-uusec-waf