# hanko vs MQTTX Web

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hanko | MQTTX Web |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 ✓ | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 40 in Authentication | #3 of 10 in IoT |
| GitHub stars | 9 051 ✓ | 5 086 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +15 | +22 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 3 ✓ |
| Latest release | backend/v3.1.0 · 1 Oct 2026 | v1.13.2 · 26 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

hanko scores 68/100 against 67/100 for MQTTX Web, so it is the safer default.

MQTTX Web ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for hanko.

If you want the quickest setup, MQTTX Web is easier to run; hanko needs more configuration.

## Details

- [hanko](https://selfhost.directory/project/hanko) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hanko.md)
- [MQTTX Web](https://selfhost.directory/project/mqttx-web) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mqttx-web.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hanko-vs-mqttx-web