# Halo vs ytdlp_web_player

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Halo | ytdlp_web_player |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 42 in Content Management | #12 of 36 in Video Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 40 075 ✓ | 809 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +188 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 8 |
| Latest release | v2.27.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | v1.3.3 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Java | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

Halo scores 79/100 against 55/100 for ytdlp_web_player, so it is the safer default.

Halo ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for ytdlp_web_player.

If you want the quickest setup, ytdlp_web_player is easier to run; Halo needs more configuration.

Halo is growing faster right now (+188 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Halo](https://selfhost.directory/project/halo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/halo.md)
- [ytdlp_web_player](https://selfhost.directory/project/ytdlpwebplayer) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ytdlpwebplayer.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/halo-vs-ytdlpwebplayer