# Halo vs Yarrtube

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Halo | Yarrtube |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 45/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 42 in Content Management | #84 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 40 073 ✓ | 198 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +197 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v2.27.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

Halo scores 79/100 against 45/100 for Yarrtube, so it is the safer default.

Halo ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Yarrtube.

Halo is growing faster right now (+197 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Halo](https://selfhost.directory/project/halo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/halo.md)
- [Yarrtube](https://selfhost.directory/project/yarrtube) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/yarrtube.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/halo-vs-yarrtube