# Halo vs Typecho

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Halo | Typecho |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 42 in Content Management | #1 of 24 in Blogging |
| GitHub stars | 40 073 ✓ | 12 456 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +197 ✓ | +9 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 2 |
| Latest release | v2.27.1 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ | ci · 17 Jul 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Java | PHP |

## Which one should you pick?

Halo scores 79/100 against 66/100 for Typecho, so it is the safer default.

Halo ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for Typecho.

If you want the quickest setup, Typecho is easier to run; Halo needs more configuration.

Halo is growing faster right now (+197 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Halo](https://selfhost.directory/project/halo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/halo.md)
- [Typecho](https://selfhost.directory/project/typecho) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/typecho.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/halo-vs-typecho