# Halo vs Text Generation WebUI

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Halo | Text Generation WebUI |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 ✓ | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 42 in Content Management | #6 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 40 079 | 47 729 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +192 ✓ | +22 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v2.27.1 · 23 Oct 2026 ✓ | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Halo scores 79/100 against 76/100 for Text Generation WebUI, so it is the safer default.

Halo ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Text Generation WebUI.

If you want the quickest setup, Text Generation WebUI is easier to run; Halo needs more configuration.

Halo is growing faster right now (+192 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Halo](https://selfhost.directory/project/halo) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/halo.md)
- [Text Generation WebUI](https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/text-generation-webui.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/halo-vs-text-generation-webui