# hadoop vs Unifi-Network-Application

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hadoop | Unifi-Network-Application |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 42/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in Distributed Systems | #26 of 34 in Network Management |
| GitHub stars | 15 702 ✓ | 195 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +33 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 0 |
| Latest release | — | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

hadoop scores 76/100 against 42/100 for Unifi-Network-Application, so it is the safer default.

If you want the quickest setup, Unifi-Network-Application is easier to run; hadoop needs more configuration.

hadoop is growing faster right now (+33 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hadoop](https://selfhost.directory/project/hadoop) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hadoop.md)
- [Unifi-Network-Application](https://selfhost.directory/project/unifi-network-application) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unifi-network-application.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hadoop-vs-unifi-network-application