hadoopvsPlausible Analytics
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| hadoop | Plausible Analytics | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in Distributed Systems | #2 of 21 in Web analytics |
| GitHub stars | 15 702 | 29 706 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 | +510 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 3 |
| Latest release | — | v3.2.1 · 1 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | Elixir |
Which one should you pick?
Plausible Analytics scores 81/100 against 76/100 for hadoop, so it is the safer default.
Plausible Analytics ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hadoop.
If you want the quickest setup, Plausible Analytics is easier to run; hadoop needs more configuration.
Plausible Analytics is growing faster right now (+510 stars in 30 days).
hadoop details →Plausible Analytics details →