# hadoop vs PanWatch

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hadoop | PanWatch |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in Distributed Systems | #3 of 9 in Fintech |
| GitHub stars | 15 702 ✓ | 2 275 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +33 | +124 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 12 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | 0.20.0 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

hadoop scores 76/100 against 62/100 for PanWatch, so it is the safer default.

PanWatch ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hadoop.

If you want the quickest setup, PanWatch is easier to run; hadoop needs more configuration.

PanWatch is growing faster right now (+124 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hadoop](https://selfhost.directory/project/hadoop) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hadoop.md)
- [PanWatch](https://selfhost.directory/project/panwatch) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/panwatch.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hadoop-vs-panwatch