# hadoop vs MikroDash

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hadoop | MikroDash |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 49/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in Distributed Systems | #27 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 15 702 ✓ | 633 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +33 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v0.8.78 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

hadoop scores 76/100 against 49/100 for MikroDash, so it is the safer default.

MikroDash ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hadoop.

If you want the quickest setup, MikroDash is easier to run; hadoop needs more configuration.

hadoop is growing faster right now (+33 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hadoop](https://selfhost.directory/project/hadoop) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hadoop.md)
- [MikroDash](https://selfhost.directory/project/mikrodash) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/mikrodash.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hadoop-vs-mikrodash