# hadoop vs iptv-proxy

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | hadoop | iptv-proxy |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 ✓ | 55/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 1 in Distributed Systems | #24 of 54 in Media Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 15 701 ✓ | 736 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +34 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | — | v4.7.1 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Java | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

hadoop scores 76/100 against 55/100 for iptv-proxy, so it is the safer default.

iptv-proxy ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hadoop.

If you want the quickest setup, iptv-proxy is easier to run; hadoop needs more configuration.

hadoop is growing faster right now (+34 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [hadoop](https://selfhost.directory/project/hadoop) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hadoop.md)
- [iptv-proxy](https://selfhost.directory/project/iptv-proxy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/iptv-proxy.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/hadoop-vs-iptv-proxy