gunvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| gun | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 87/100 |
| Rank in category | #16 of 38 in Databases | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 19 158 | 117 928 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +21 | +5 569 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 11 |
| Latest release | — | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 68/100 for gun, so it is the safer default.
TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for gun.
If you want the quickest setup, gun is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 569 stars in 30 days).
gun details →TradingAgents details →