growthbookvsWorkout.cool
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| growthbook | Workout.cool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 8 in Feature Flags | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 8 546 | 8 652 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +121 | +153 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 1 |
| Latest release | v5.1.0 · 22 Sept 2026 | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
growthbook scores 71/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.
growthbook ships more often: 6 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.
If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; growthbook needs more configuration.
growthbook details →Workout.cool details →