growthbookvsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| growthbook | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 8 in Feature Flags | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 8 546 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +121 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 10 |
| Latest release | v5.1.0 · 22 Sept 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
growthbook scores 71/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.
Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for growthbook.
If you want the quickest setup, growthbook is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
growthbook is growing faster right now (+121 stars in 30 days).
growthbook details →Windows ARM details →