growthbookvsSemaphore UI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| growthbook | Semaphore UI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 8 in Feature Flags | #12 of 166 in Developer Tools |
| GitHub stars | 8 545 | 14 334 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +124 | +151 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 20 |
| Latest release | v5.1.0 · 22 Sept 2026 | v2.18.31 · 7 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Semaphore UI scores 73/100 against 71/100 for growthbook, so it is the safer default.
Semaphore UI ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for growthbook.
If you want the quickest setup, Semaphore UI is easier to run; growthbook needs more configuration.
growthbook details →Semaphore UI details →