growthbookvsopenclaw
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| growthbook | openclaw | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 93/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 8 in Feature Flags | #1 of 125 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 8 545 | 393 295 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +124 | +2 947 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 6 | 37 |
| Latest release | v5.1.0 · 22 Sept 2026 | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Other | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
openclaw scores 93/100 against 71/100 for growthbook, so it is the safer default.
openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for growthbook.
openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 947 stars in 30 days).
growthbook details →openclaw details →