# grok-reg-tool vs Stirling-PDF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | grok-reg-tool | Stirling-PDF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 38/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #24 of 26 in Automation | #1 of 46 in Document Management |
| GitHub stars | 217 | 95 266 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +2 353 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 25 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.1.2 · 8 Jun 2026 | v3.2.2 · 24 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

Stirling-PDF scores 87/100 against 38/100 for grok-reg-tool, so it is the safer default.

Stirling-PDF ships more often: 25 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for grok-reg-tool.

Stirling-PDF is growing faster right now (+2 353 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [grok-reg-tool](https://selfhost.directory/project/grok-reg-tool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/grok-reg-tool.md)
- [Stirling-PDF](https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/stirling-pdf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/grok-reg-tool-vs-stirling-pdf