# grok-reg-tool vs llama.cpp

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | grok-reg-tool | llama.cpp |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 38/100 | 93/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #24 of 26 in Automation | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 217 | 132 714 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +3 259 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 1467 ✓ |
| Latest release | v0.1.2 · 8 Jun 2026 | b11981 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate ✓ |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | C++ |

## Which one should you pick?

llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 38/100 for grok-reg-tool, so it is the safer default.

llama.cpp ships more often: 1467 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for grok-reg-tool.

llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 259 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [grok-reg-tool](https://selfhost.directory/project/grok-reg-tool) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/grok-reg-tool.md)
- [llama.cpp](https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/llamacpp.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/grok-reg-tool-vs-llamacpp