grok-reg-toolvsllama.cpp
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| grok-reg-tool | llama.cpp | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 38/100 | 93/100 |
| Rank in category | #24 of 26 in Automation | #2 of 25 in LLM Inference |
| GitHub stars | 217 | 132 714 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +3 259 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 1467 |
| Latest release | v0.1.2 · 8 Jun 2026 | b11981 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | C++ |
Which one should you pick?
llama.cpp scores 93/100 against 38/100 for grok-reg-tool, so it is the safer default.
llama.cpp ships more often: 1467 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for grok-reg-tool.
llama.cpp is growing faster right now (+3 259 stars in 30 days).
grok-reg-tool details →llama.cpp details →
Swap a project
Keep grok-reg-tool, compare it with
Keep llama.cpp, compare it with