# grocy vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | grocy | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 15 in Home Management | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 9 625 | 117 997 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +100 | +5 638 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 11 ✓ |
| Latest release | v4.7.1 · 4 Sept 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Blade | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 75/100 for grocy, so it is the safer default.

TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for grocy.

If you want the quickest setup, grocy is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 638 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [grocy](https://selfhost.directory/project/grocy) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/grocy.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/grocy-vs-tradingagents