# Grist vs zookeeper

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Grist | zookeeper |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 10 in Data Management | #1 of 8 in Configuration Management |
| GitHub stars | 12 014 | 12 826 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +155 ✓ | +15 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.7.21 · 9 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |

## Which one should you pick?

Grist scores 75/100 against 73/100 for zookeeper, so it is the safer default.

Grist ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for zookeeper.

If you want the quickest setup, Grist is easier to run; zookeeper needs more configuration.

Grist is growing faster right now (+155 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Grist](https://selfhost.directory/project/grist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/grist.md)
- [zookeeper](https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/zookeeper.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/grist-vs-zookeeper