# Grist vs Wildbox

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Grist | Wildbox |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 10 in Data Management | #56 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 12 018 ✓ | 134 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +159 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.7.22 · 29 Oct 2026 ✓ | v0.12.2 · 6 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Grist scores 75/100 against 44/100 for Wildbox, so it is the safer default.

Grist ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Wildbox.

If you want the quickest setup, Grist is easier to run; Wildbox needs more configuration.

Grist is growing faster right now (+159 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Grist](https://selfhost.directory/project/grist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/grist.md)
- [Wildbox](https://selfhost.directory/project/wildbox) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/wildbox.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/grist-vs-wildbox