# Grist vs Uptime-Kuma-Web-API

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Grist | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 ✓ | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 10 in Data Management | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 12 012 ✓ | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +153 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.7.21 · 9 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

Grist scores 75/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.

Grist ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.

If you want the quickest setup, Grist is easier to run; Uptime-Kuma-Web-API needs more configuration.

Grist is growing faster right now (+153 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Grist](https://selfhost.directory/project/grist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/grist.md)
- [Uptime-Kuma-Web-API](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/grist-vs-uptime-kuma-web-api