# Grist vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | Grist | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 75/100 | 87/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 10 in Data Management | #3 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 12 012 | 117 997 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +153 | +5 638 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.7.21 · 9 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 87/100 against 75/100 for Grist, so it is the safer default.

Grist ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.

If you want the quickest setup, Grist is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 638 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [Grist](https://selfhost.directory/project/grist) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/grist.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/grist-vs-tradingagents