# grimmory vs UUSEC WAF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | grimmory | UUSEC WAF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Book Management | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 4 626 ✓ | 1 719 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +201 ✓ | +7 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v3.5.0 · 21 Sept 2026 | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Java | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

grimmory scores 69/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.

grimmory ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.

grimmory is growing faster right now (+201 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [grimmory](https://selfhost.directory/project/grimmory) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/grimmory.md)
- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/grimmory-vs-uusec-waf