# grimmory vs Uptime-Kuma-Web-API

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | grimmory | Uptime-Kuma-Web-API |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 ✓ | 39/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Book Management | #12 of 13 in API |
| GitHub stars | 4 626 ✓ | 282 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +201 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v3.5.0 · 21 Sept 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | — |
| Main language | Java | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

grimmory scores 69/100 against 39/100 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API, so it is the safer default.

grimmory ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Uptime-Kuma-Web-API.

grimmory is growing faster right now (+201 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [grimmory](https://selfhost.directory/project/grimmory) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/grimmory.md)
- [Uptime-Kuma-Web-API](https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uptime-kuma-web-api.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/grimmory-vs-uptime-kuma-web-api