# grimmory vs RustFS

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | grimmory | RustFS |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 74/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Book Management | #1 of 5 in Storage |
| GitHub stars | 4 624 | 35 504 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +205 | +1 772 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 5 |
| Latest release | v3.5.0 · 21 Sept 2026 | 1.0.4 · 25 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Java | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

RustFS scores 74/100 against 69/100 for grimmory, so it is the safer default.

grimmory ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for RustFS.

If you want the quickest setup, grimmory is easier to run; RustFS needs more configuration.

RustFS is growing faster right now (+1 772 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [grimmory](https://selfhost.directory/project/grimmory) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/grimmory.md)
- [RustFS](https://selfhost.directory/project/rustfs) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/rustfs.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/grimmory-vs-rustfs