# grimmory vs QGIS Web Client

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | grimmory | QGIS Web Client |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 ✓ | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Book Management | #9 of 12 in Maps |
| GitHub stars | 4 626 ✓ | 383 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +201 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 10 |
| Latest release | v3.5.0 · 21 Sept 2026 | ci-latest-master · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Java | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

grimmory scores 69/100 against 57/100 for QGIS Web Client, so it is the safer default.

grimmory ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for QGIS Web Client.

If you want the quickest setup, grimmory is easier to run; QGIS Web Client needs more configuration.

grimmory is growing faster right now (+201 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [grimmory](https://selfhost.directory/project/grimmory) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/grimmory.md)
- [QGIS Web Client](https://selfhost.directory/project/qwc2) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qwc2.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/grimmory-vs-qwc2