# grimmory vs IPFS Web UI

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | grimmory | IPFS Web UI |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 ✓ | 60/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Book Management | #12 of 27 in File Sharing & Collaboration |
| GitHub stars | 4 624 ✓ | 1 636 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +205 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 ✓ | 6 |
| Latest release | v3.5.0 · 21 Sept 2026 ✓ | v4.13.0 · 18 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Java | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

grimmory scores 69/100 against 60/100 for IPFS Web UI, so it is the safer default.

grimmory ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for IPFS Web UI.

If you want the quickest setup, IPFS Web UI is easier to run; grimmory needs more configuration.

grimmory is growing faster right now (+205 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [grimmory](https://selfhost.directory/project/grimmory) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/grimmory.md)
- [IPFS Web UI](https://selfhost.directory/project/ipfs-webui) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/ipfs-webui.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/grimmory-vs-ipfs-webui