# graymatter vs memory-os

> Two self-hosted [Mem0 alternatives](https://selfhost.directory/alternative-to/mem0), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | graymatter | memory-os |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 53/100 ✓ | 40/100 |
| Rank in category | #38 of 125 in AI | #167 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 488 | 1 384 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +12 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v0.20.1 · 9 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

graymatter scores 53/100 against 40/100 for memory-os, so it is the safer default.

graymatter ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for memory-os.

If you want the quickest setup, graymatter is easier to run; memory-os needs more configuration.

memory-os is growing faster right now (+12 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [graymatter](https://selfhost.directory/project/graymatter) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/graymatter.md)
- [memory-os](https://selfhost.directory/project/memory-os) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/memory-os.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/graymatter-vs-memory-os