# graphiti vs supermemory

> Two self-hosted [Zep alternatives](https://selfhost.directory/alternative-to/zep), compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | graphiti | supermemory |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 ✓ | 73/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 7 in RAG | #19 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 32 311 ✓ | 31 450 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +1 199 ✓ | +602 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v0.31.2 · 20 Oct 2026 ✓ | server-v0.0.9 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

graphiti scores 78/100 against 73/100 for supermemory, so it is the safer default.

graphiti ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for supermemory.

If you want the quickest setup, supermemory is easier to run; graphiti needs more configuration.

## Details

- [graphiti](https://selfhost.directory/project/graphiti) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/graphiti.md)
- [supermemory](https://selfhost.directory/project/supermemory) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/supermemory.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/graphiti-vs-supermemory