# GraphHopper vs QGIS Web Client

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | GraphHopper | QGIS Web Client |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 ✓ | 57/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 7 in Navigation | #9 of 12 in Maps |
| GitHub stars | 6 748 ✓ | 383 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +45 ✓ | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 10 ✓ |
| Latest release | 11.1 · 29 Sept 2026 | ci-latest-master · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes ✓ |
| License | Apache-2.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Java | JavaScript |

## Which one should you pick?

GraphHopper scores 70/100 against 57/100 for QGIS Web Client, so it is the safer default.

QGIS Web Client ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for GraphHopper.

If you want the quickest setup, GraphHopper is easier to run; QGIS Web Client needs more configuration.

GraphHopper is growing faster right now (+45 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [GraphHopper](https://selfhost.directory/project/graphhopper) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/graphhopper.md)
- [QGIS Web Client](https://selfhost.directory/project/qwc2) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/qwc2.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/graphhopper-vs-qwc2