gramps-webvsInvokeAI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| gramps-web | InvokeAI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 66/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 5 in Research | #2 of 11 in Image Generation |
| GitHub stars | 1 783 | 28 903 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +87 | +623 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 13 |
| Latest release | v26.10.2 · 20 Oct 2026 | v6.14.2 · 27 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
InvokeAI scores 82/100 against 66/100 for gramps-web, so it is the safer default.
gramps-web ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 13 for InvokeAI.
If you want the quickest setup, InvokeAI is easier to run; gramps-web needs more configuration.
InvokeAI is growing faster right now (+623 stars in 30 days).
gramps-web details →InvokeAI details →
Swap a project
Keep gramps-web, compare it with
Keep InvokeAI, compare it with