# grafana vs UUSEC WAF

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | grafana | UUSEC WAF |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 ✓ | 59/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #2 of 3 in Web Application Firewall |
| GitHub stars | 77 569 ✓ | 1 718 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +695 ✓ | +6 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 53 ✓ | 9 |
| Latest release | v13.2.5 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v7.2.6 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | BSD-2-Clause |
| Main language | Typescript | Shell |

## Which one should you pick?

grafana scores 90/100 against 59/100 for UUSEC WAF, so it is the safer default.

grafana ships more often: 53 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for UUSEC WAF.

grafana is growing faster right now (+695 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [grafana](https://selfhost.directory/project/grafana) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/grafana.md)
- [UUSEC WAF](https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/uusec-waf.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/grafana-vs-uusec-waf