grafanavstunesynctool
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| grafana | tunesynctool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 | 41/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #43 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 77 588 | 158 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +695 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 53 | 1 |
| Latest release | v13.2.5 · 27 Oct 2026 | v1.2.2 · 6 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
grafana scores 90/100 against 41/100 for tunesynctool, so it is the safer default.
grafana ships more often: 53 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for tunesynctool.
If you want the quickest setup, grafana is easier to run; tunesynctool needs more configuration.
grafana is growing faster right now (+695 stars in 30 days).
grafana details →tunesynctool details →
Swap a project
Keep grafana, compare it with
Keep tunesynctool, compare it with