# grafana vs issue-status

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | grafana | issue-status |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 ✓ | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #31 of 51 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 77 575 ✓ | 429 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +701 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 53 ✓ | 0 |
| Latest release | v13.2.5 · 27 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Typescript |

## Which one should you pick?

grafana scores 90/100 against 47/100 for issue-status, so it is the safer default.

grafana ships more often: 53 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for issue-status.

If you want the quickest setup, issue-status is easier to run; grafana needs more configuration.

grafana is growing faster right now (+701 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [grafana](https://selfhost.directory/project/grafana) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/grafana.md)
- [issue-status](https://selfhost.directory/project/issue-status) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/issue-status.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/grafana-vs-issue-status