# grafana vs HiClaw

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | grafana | HiClaw |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 90/100 ✓ | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 104 in Monitoring & observability | #32 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 77 573 ✓ | 5 886 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +699 ✓ | +223 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 53 ✓ | 15 |
| Latest release | v13.2.5 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ | v1.2.5 · 16 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |

## Which one should you pick?

grafana scores 90/100 against 67/100 for HiClaw, so it is the safer default.

grafana ships more often: 53 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for HiClaw.

If you want the quickest setup, HiClaw is easier to run; grafana needs more configuration.

grafana is growing faster right now (+699 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [grafana](https://selfhost.directory/project/grafana) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/grafana.md)
- [HiClaw](https://selfhost.directory/project/hiclaw) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/hiclaw.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/grafana-vs-hiclaw