# gpt-researcher vs unbagrnd

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | gpt-researcher | unbagrnd |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 ✓ | 46/100 |
| Rank in category | #5 of 69 in AI Chat | #10 of 13 in Image Processing |
| GitHub stars | 30 357 ✓ | 178 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +745 ✓ | +-1 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 ✓ | 8 |
| Latest release | v3.7.0 · 26 Sept 2026 | v0.5.6 · 14 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy ✓ |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Rust |

## Which one should you pick?

gpt-researcher scores 80/100 against 46/100 for unbagrnd, so it is the safer default.

gpt-researcher ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for unbagrnd.

If you want the quickest setup, unbagrnd is easier to run; gpt-researcher needs more configuration.

gpt-researcher is growing faster right now (+745 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [gpt-researcher](https://selfhost.directory/project/gpt-researcher) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gpt-researcher.md)
- [unbagrnd](https://selfhost.directory/project/unbagrnd) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/unbagrnd.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/gpt-researcher-vs-unbagrnd