# gpt-researcher vs TradingAgents

> Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.

| | gpt-researcher | TradingAgents |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 86/100 ✓ |
| Rank in category | #5 of 69 in AI Chat | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 30 332 | 117 655 ✓ |
| Stars, last 30 days | +739 | +5 296 ✓ |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 ✓ | 11 |
| Latest release | v3.7.0 · 26 Sept 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 ✓ |
| Setup | Moderate ✓ | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes ✓ | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | Python |

## Which one should you pick?

TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 80/100 for gpt-researcher, so it is the safer default.

gpt-researcher ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.

TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 296 stars in 30 days).

## Details

- [gpt-researcher](https://selfhost.directory/project/gpt-researcher) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/gpt-researcher.md)
- [TradingAgents](https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents) (markdown: https://selfhost.directory/project/tradingagents.md)

---
Source: https://selfhost.directory/compare/gpt-researcher-vs-tradingagents